Origin Standard

GB/T 2012-1989 Aromatic hydrocarbon acid wash test method

AI-translated method card — human verification pending. This is not an official translation of the standard. Unclear source values remain unverified; check the original standard and product certificate before use.

Card type: Test method

1. Method number / full name / English name / replacement relationship

2. Scope of application and non-applicability

3. Method principle

Under specified conditions, shake an equal volume of the sample with 95% (m/m) sulfuric acid, and compare the color of the acid layer with that of the standard colorimetric solution.

4. Reagents and materials (purity / preparation)

5. Instruments and equipment

6. Recommended operating conditions

7. Sampling and sample preparation

8. Analysis procedure

9. Qualitative and quantitative and calculation formula

10. Precision

Use the following provisions to judge the reliability of test results (95% confidence level).

11. Report

The result is reported as lighter than the standard colorimetric liquid specified in the product standard; equal to the standard colorimetric liquid specified in the product standard; although darker than the standard colorimetric liquid specified in the product standard, but within the precision error range; or darker than the standard colorimetric liquid specified in the product standard.

12. Normative References

13. Source and verification

This page is an AI translation of the available Chinese method card. Human verification is pending. It is not an official translation of the standard. Check the source standard and product certificate before use.

14. Quick Q&A Reference

Question Key Answer
Standard number and name? GB 2012—89 Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acid Wash Test Method; English Aromatic hydrocarbons—Test method of acid wash.
Which standard does it replace? Replaces GB 2012—80.
What international standard is adopted? Equivalent adoption of ISO 5274-1979 Aromatic Hydrocarbons Acid Wash Test Method.
Scope of application? Applicable to aromatic hydrocarbons; specifies the test method for acid wash colorimetric testing of aromatic hydrocarbons.
Method summary? Under specified conditions, an equal volume of sample is shaken with 95% (m/m) sulfuric acid, and the acid layer is compared in color with a standard colorimetric liquid.
What acid is used? 95±0.5% (m/m) sulfuric acid is used for the test; approximately 98% (m/m) sulfuric acid is used to prepare the stock dilute acid solution.
What is used to prepare the standard colorimetric liquid? Prepared by dissolving potassium dichromate in sulfuric acid and distilled water; refer to Annex A.
When is the standard colorimetric liquid prepared? It should be prepared on the same day it is used (5.1.5).
Specifications of the colorimetric tubes? Round cylinders with ground glass stoppers, thin-walled colorless glass, height approximately 100 mm, inner diameter, wall thickness, and graduation lines as in 3.1 (some values require confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction)).
Water bath temperature? Can be controlled at 20±1°C (the source text source-text extraction is “201°C”, requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction)).
Shaking and standing times? Shake vigorously for 2 min±5 s, then let stand for 10 min±5 s (the source text source-text extraction requires confirmation against the source standard).
How is the sample handled? Filter, discard the first 10 mL of filtrate, and pour the filtrate into the third colorimetric tube up to the lower graduation line.
How is the result reported? Reported as lighter than, equal to, although darker but within the precision error range, or darker than the standard colorimetric liquid specified in the product standard.
Precision conditions? 95% confidence level; repeatability and reproducibility according to the precision table.
Safety precautions? Aromatic hydrocarbons are toxic; volatile aromatic hydrocarbons are extremely flammable; pay attention to safety and health issues.
Drafting and administration? Technical administration by the Research Institute of Petroleum Processing; drafting responsibility by Fushun Petrochemical Company Petroleum No. 2 Plant; main drafters Zhu Li and Wang Yongqi.

Related public products

Method references do not confirm that a product is suitable for this edition. Check its certificate and availability.

Search related products

Source and review status

This translation has not received a complete independent technical review. Missing sections and unclear source values remain identified above.