Origin Standard

GB/T 382-2025 Kerosene and Jet Fuel Smoke Point Determination Method

AI-translated method card — human verification pending. This is not an official translation of the standard. Unclear source values remain unverified; check the original standard and product certificate before use.

Card type: Test method

1. Method number / full name / English name / replacement relationship

2. Scope of application and non-applicability

3. Method principle

The test sample is burned in a closed wick lamp, which is calibrated with a pure hydrocarbon mixture of known smoke point. The maximum smokeless flame height of the test sample is determined by manual instrument or automatic instrument, and the reported value is accurate to 0.1 mm.

4. Reagents and materials (purity / preparation)

Unless otherwise specified, the reagents used in the test process are all of analytical grade or above purity.

Number Name Purity/requirement Remarks
6.1 Toluene Purity not less than 99.5% Flammable, vapor toxic
6.2 2,2,4- trimethylpentane (isooctane) Purity not less than 99.75% Flammable, vapor toxic
6.3 Anhydrous methanol (methyl alcohol) Purity specification not provided in the available source Flammable, vapor toxic
6.4 Standard fuel mixture Prepared according to the composition in Table 1, accurately measured with a calibrated pipette (5.6) for toluene and isooctane —
6.5 n-Heptane Purity specification not provided in the available source Extremely flammable, vapor toxic
6.6 Quality control (QC) sample Stable petroleum product capable of representing the characteristics of the sample being tested Periodically determined to check system status

Table 1 Standard fuel mixture

Standard smoke point value at atmospheric pressure 101.3 kPa/mm Toluene (volume fraction)/% Isooctane (volume fraction)/%
14.7 40 60
20.2 25 75
22.7 20 80
25.8 15 85
30.2 10 90
35.4 5 95
42.8 0 100

5. Instruments and equipment

6. Recommended operating conditions

7. Sampling and sample preparation

8. Analysis procedure

8.1 Instrument preparation

8.2 Instrument calibration

8.3 Test Procedure

9. Qualitative and Quantitative and Calculation Formulas

10. Precision

12.1 Overview

The precision of this document was obtained by testing 15 different blind samples on 11 manual instruments and 13 automatic instruments respectively. The 11 manual instruments and the 13 automatic instruments respectively belong to different laboratories. 12.2, 12.3, 12.4 specify the reliability requirements for judging test results (95% confidence level). The precision data for manual instruments in this document apply to atmospheric pressure 70 kPa~102 kPa, and the precision data for automatic instruments apply to atmospheric pressure 75 kPa~102 kPa; for smoke point determinations at other pressures, the precision may be used for reference.

12.2 Manual instrument (see Table 2 and Figure 9)

12.3 Automatic instrument (see Table 2 and Figure 9)

Table 2 Typical precision values

Smoke point average/mm Manual instrument r Manual instrument R Automatic instrument r Automatic instrument R
15 2.12 2.90 0.33 0.74
20 2.46 3.37 0.45 0.83
25 2.80 3.84 0.56 0.91
30 3.15 4.31 0.67 0.99
35 3.49 4.78 0.78 1.07
40 3.83 5.24 0.89 1.16
42 3.97 5.43 0.94 1.19

12.4 Bias

11. Report

The report shall include at least the following:

12. Normative references

13. Source and verification

This page is an AI translation of the available Chinese method card. Human verification is pending. It is not an official translation of the standard. Check the source standard and product certificate before use.

14. Quick Q&A

Question Key answer
What is the standard number? GB/T 382—2025
Which version does it replace? GB/T 382—2017
Issue/implementation date? Issued on 2025-10-05, implemented on 2026-05-01
Scope of application? Determination of smoke point of kerosene and jet fuel, manual and automatic methods
Atmospheric pressure range applicable to manual instrument precision? 70 kPa~102 kPa
Atmospheric pressure range applicable to automatic instrument precision? 75 kPa~102 kPa
Arbitration method? In case of dispute, the automatic instrument method is the arbitration method (5.3)
Method summary? The sample is burned in a closed wick lamp, calibrated with a known smoke point pure hydrocarbon mixture, the maximum smokeless flame height is determined, and reported to 0.1 mm
How many standard fuel mixtures are there? 7 types (Table 1)
Composition of standard fuel mixtures? Toluene and isooctane prepared according to Table 1 volume fractions
Number of wick extraction cycles? At least 25 times (8.3.1)
Wick drying conditions? Dry at 105 ℃±5 ℃ for 30 min (8.3.1)
Sample temperature requirement? 20 ℃±5 ℃ (Chapter 7, 10.1.2)
Manual instrument reading accuracy? Accurate to 0.5 mm (10.2.3)
Automatic instrument reading accuracy? Accurate to 0.1 mm (10.3.5)
Result reporting accuracy? 0.1 mm (Chapter 13)
Atmospheric pressure recording accuracy? 0.1 kPa (Chapter 13)
Manual instrument correction coefficient formula? f = [(As/Ad) + (Bs/Bd)] / 2 (9.1.3)
Manual instrument smoke point calculation formula? h = L × f (11.1)
Manual instrument repeatability formula? r = 0.06840(X1 + 16) (12.2.1)
Manual instrument reproducibility formula? R = 0.09363(X2 + 16) (12.2.2)
Automatic instrument repeatability formula? r = 0.02231X1 (12.3.1)
Automatic instrument reproducibility formula? R = 0.01651(X2 + 30) (12.3.2)
Bias relationship between manual and automatic procedures? (A + 16) = (M + 16) / 1.016 (12.4.2)
What does the test report include? Sample name and number, test instrument, test result, atmospheric pressure, standard used, abnormal phenomena, test date (Chapter 13)
Which standards are cited for sampling? GB/T 4756, GB/T 27867 or SH/T 0635 (Chapter 7)
In which annex are the smoke point lamp specifications found? Annex A (normative)
In which annex is the wick extraction help information found? Annex B (informative)

Related public products

Method references do not confirm that a product is suitable for this edition. Check its certificate and availability.

Search related products

Source and review status

This translation has not received a complete independent technical review. Missing sections and unclear source values remain identified above.