Origin Standard

NB/SH/T 0831-2010 Determination of fatty acid methyl esters and linolenic acid methyl ester content in biodiesel — Gas chromatography

AI-translated method card — human verification pending. This is not an official translation of the standard. Unclear source values remain unverified; check the original standard and product certificate before use.

Card type: Test method

1. Method number / full title / English title / replacement relationship

2. Scope of application and non-applicability

3. Method principle

A test sample to which a certain amount of methyl heptadecanoate internal standard has been added in advance is introduced into a gas chromatography system. The fatty acid methyl esters in the sample are separated on a strongly polar capillary column with polyethylene glycol as the stationary phase, detected with a flame ionization detector, and quantified by the internal standard method to obtain the content of fatty acid methyl esters and the content of linolenic acid methyl ester.

4. Reagents and materials (purity / preparation)

5. Apparatus and equipment

(Note: the original text at numbers 5.3~5.5 has severe source-text extraction noise; the numbers are inferred from the context and require confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))

6. Recommended operating conditions

Table 1 Chromatographic analysis conditions (the original table source-text extraction has severe noise; the following is the identifiable content and requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction)):

Condition Parameter
Inlet temperature 200°C
Split flow 100 mL/min
Injection volume not provided in the available source (source-text extraction missing)
Carrier gas type helium, hydrogen or nitrogen (elsewhere argon or helium is mentioned; requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))
Column head pressure 30 kPa ~ 100 kPa
Flow rate not provided in the available source (source-text extraction missing; suspected to be 1 mL/min~2 mL/min; requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))
Column temperature initial temperature 210°C, hold for 20 min; heating rate 5°C/min to 220°C, hold for 20 min (requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))
Detector flame ionization detector (FID)
Detector temperature 250°C

7. Sampling and sample preparation

8. Analytical procedure

9. Qualitative and quantitative determination and calculation formulas

8.1 Fatty acid methyl ester content

8.1.1 Fatty acid methyl ester content C, calculated according to formula (1):

C = (ΣA − A_internal standard) / A_internal standard × C_internal standard × V_internal standard / m × 100 ......(1)

Where:

(Note: formula source-text extraction has severe noise; the above is reconstructed from the context and requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))

8.1.2 Report the result to one decimal place.

8.2 Determination of linolenic acid methyl ester content

8.2.1 Linolenic acid methyl ester content C_linolenic acid, expressed as the mass fraction of linolenic acid methyl ester content in the sample (%), calculated according to formula (2):

C_linolenic acid = A_linolenic acid / ΣA × C ......(2)

Where:

Report the result to one decimal place.

Figure 1 Typical chromatogram of rapeseed oil biodiesel (peak assignment)

1— Methyl myristate (C14); 2— Methyl palmitate (C16); 3— Methyl palmitoleate; 4— Methyl heptadecanoate (internal standard); 5— Methyl stearate (C18); 6— Methyl oleate (C18:1); 7— Methyl linoleate (C18:2); 8— Methyl linolenate (C18:3); 9— Methyl arachidate (C20); 10— Methyl gadoleate (C20:1); 11— Methyl behenate (C22); 12— Methyl erucate (C22:1); 13— Methyl lignocerate (C24:0); 14— Methyl nervonate (C24:1).

(Note: The correspondence between peak numbers and names source-text extraction has severe noise, requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))

10. Precision

In the year 2000, an interlaboratory precision test was conducted with the participation of 11 laboratories. Each sample was determined twice. The statistical results are shown in Annex A. The reliability of the test results shall be judged according to the following provisions (95% confidence level).

9.1 Repeatability

The difference between two determination results for the same sample obtained by the same laboratory, the same operator, using the same instrument and equipment, under the same experimental conditions shall not exceed the value in Table 2.

Table 2 Repeatability:

Item Value
Mass fraction of fatty acid methyl esters 1.6%
Mass fraction of methyl linolenate 0.1%

9.2 Reproducibility

The difference between two independent determination results for the same sample obtained by different laboratories, different operators, using different instruments shall not exceed the value in Table 3.

Table 3 Reproducibility:

Item Value
Mass fraction of fatty acid methyl esters 3.1%
Mass fraction of methyl linolenate 0.311X + 0.02%

Note: X is the average of two independent determination results.

Annex A (Informative Annex) Interlaboratory Test Results

This test involved the analysis results of 5 countries and 11 laboratories in Europe for 5 samples.

This test project was organized by the CEN TC 307/WG1 working group in the year 2000. The test results obtained were statistically analyzed in accordance with the requirements of ISO 4259. The precision data obtained are shown in Table A.1 and Table A.2.

Table A.1 Mass fraction of fatty acid methyl esters (source-text extraction has severe noise, some data require confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction)):

Item Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5
Number of participating laboratories (No) 11 11 11 11 11
Number of laboratories after removing outlier laboratories (No) not provided in the available source 6 9 9 9
Average of determinations/% 98.14 99.68 90.97 97.73 92.61
Standard deviation of repeatability determinations/% 0.35 0.36 0.36 0.69 not provided in the available source
Standard deviation of reproducibility determinations/% 0.99 0.32 0.98 0.90 not provided in the available source
Repeatability allowable difference (r)/% 1.11 1.24 1.16 2.21 not provided in the available source
Reproducibility allowable difference (R)/% 3.15 1.11 3.14 2.88 not provided in the available source

(Note: The correspondence between data columns and samples in Table A.1 source-text extraction has severe misalignment, requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))

Table A.2 Mass fraction of methyl linolenate (source-text extraction has severe noise, requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction)):

Item Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 Sample 5
Number of participating laboratories (No) 11 11 11 11 11
Number of laboratories after removing outlier laboratories (No) not provided in the available source not provided in the available source 10 11 9
Average of determinations/% 3.85 0.13 9.07 9.28 9.00
Standard deviation of repeatability determinations/% 0.04 0.01 0.03 0.08 0.03
Standard deviation of reproducibility determinations/% 0.32 0.06 1.13 0.86 0.75
Repeatability allowable difference (r)/% 1.00 0.03 0.09 0.26 0.09
Reproducibility allowable difference (R)/% 0.12 0.18 3.57 2.68 2.41

(Note: The correspondence between data columns and samples in Table A.2 source-text extraction has severe misalignment, requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))

Annex B (Informative Annex) Comparison of Clause Numbers between This Standard and EN 14103:2003

Table B.1 provides a comparison list of clause numbers between this standard and EN 14103:2003. Except for the clause numbers listed in the comparison table, the other clauses of this standard are identical in clause number and correspond in content to those of EN 14103:2003.

(Note: The specific comparison content of Table B.1 source-text extraction is severely missing, requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))

11. Report

The report shall include the following contents:

12. Normative References

13. Source and verification

This page is an AI translation of the available Chinese method card. Human verification is pending. It is not an official translation of the standard. Check the source standard and product certificate before use.

14. Quick Reference Q&A

Question Key Answer Points
What does this standard measure? Total content of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) and methyl linolenate content in biodiesel
Applicable FAME content range? Mass fraction greater than 90%
Determination range for methyl linolenate? 1%~15%
Applicable carbon chain range? C14 to C24 fatty acid methyl esters
Method principle? Add methyl heptadecanoate internal standard, separate on a strongly polar polyethylene glycol capillary column, FID detection, quantify by internal standard method
What is the internal standard? Methyl heptadecanoate, purity greater than 99%
Internal standard solution concentration? 10 mg/mL (prepared in n-heptane)
Sampling basis? GB/T 4756
Sample weight? About 250 mg, accurate to 0.1 mg
Volume of internal standard added? 5 mL
Chromatographic column requirements? Polyethylene glycol stationary phase (Carbowax 20M, Dbwax, Cpwax, etc.), 30 m×0.32 mm or 0.25 mm×0.25 μm
Detector? Flame ionization detector (FID), 250°C
Inlet temperature? 200°C
Column temperature program? Initial temperature 210°C held for 20 min, 5°C/min raised to 220°C held for 20 min (requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))
Carrier gas? Helium, hydrogen or nitrogen (argon is mentioned elsewhere, requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))
Quantification method? Internal standard method, formula (1) calculates FAME content, formula (2) calculates methyl linolenate content
What to do if result exceeds 100.2%? Discard the determination value, check the test conditions and purity of the internal standard
Repeatability (FAME)? 1.6%
Repeatability (methyl linolenate)? 0.1%
Reproducibility (FAME)? 3.1%
Reproducibility (methyl linolenate)? 0.311X + 0.02%
International standard adopted? Modified adoption of EN 14103:2003
Main differences from EN 14103? Reference to our national standards, addition of argon carrier gas column conditions, correction of formulas (2), adjustment of annexes
Scale of precision test? Year 2000, 11 laboratories, 5 samples, each sample tested twice

Related public products

Method references do not confirm that a product is suitable for this edition. Check its certificate and availability.

Search related products

Source and review status

This translation has not received a complete independent technical review. Missing sections and unclear source values remain identified above.