Origin Standard

SH/T 0077-1991 Determination of Iron Content in Lubricating Oils (Atomic Absorption Spectrometry)

AI-translated method card — human verification pending. This is not an official translation of the standard. Unclear source values remain unverified; check the original standard and product certificate before use.

Card type: Test method

1. Method number / full title / English name / replacement relationship

2. Scope of application and non-applicability

Part One Ashing Method (Chapter 1)

Part Two Direct Method (Chapter 12)

Not applicable: not provided in the available source.

3. Method principle

Part One Ashing Method (Chapter 3 Method summary) After the sample is ashed and dissolved in hydrochloric acid, a sample solution containing hydrochloric acid is prepared. The absorbance of iron atoms at wavelength 248.3 nm is measured by atomic absorption spectrometry. Using a hydrochloric acid solution of ferric oxide as the reference solution, the iron content in the sample is determined.

Part Two Direct Method (Chapter 14 Method summary) The sample is diluted with an organic solvent in a certain proportion and directly sprayed into the flame of an atomic absorption spectrometer to measure the absorbance. The absorbance of the sample is compared with the absorbance of the reference solution to determine the iron content in the sample.

4. Reagents and materials (purity / preparation)

Part One Ashing Method

Materials (4.2):

Reagents (Chapter 5):

Preparation of iron standard stock solution (6.1): Weigh dried ferric oxide 1.4296 g (accurate to 0.1 mg), dissolve with 1:1 (by volume ratio) hydrochloric acid solution 20 mL, transfer to a 1000 mL volumetric flask, dilute to the mark with deionized water, and mix well. Prepare an iron standard stock solution with an iron content of 1 mg/mL, and store it in a narrow-mouth polyethylene plastic bottle.

Preparation of standard solutions (6.4.1): Use a pipette to draw an appropriate amount of the iron standard stock solution from clause 6.1 into a volumetric flask, dilute with deionized water so that the hydrochloric acid concentration in each standard working solution is 10%(V/V). Prepare standard solutions with concentrations of: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20 μg/mL. Note: This standard solution need not be prepared on the same day and can be used for several weeks.

Part Two Direct Method

Materials (15.2):

Reagents (Chapter 16):

Blank solution (17.1): Paint industry solvent naphtha is the blank solution.

Preparation of iron standard stock solution (17.2): Weigh an appropriate amount of the organic iron standard into a 100 mL beaker (accurate to 0.1 mg), add 3 mL toluene, 7 mL 2- ethylhexanoic acid and 20 g white oil, stir and dissolve under warm conditions (maximum 50℃), after cooling to 15~20℃, make up to 100 g with white oil, and store in a narrow-mouth bottle. This solution is an iron standard stock solution of 200 mg/kg. Note: The iron standard stock solution can be stored for three months.

Preparation of standard working solutions (18.1): Use a pipette to accurately take an appropriate amount of the iron standard stock solution into a 25 mL volumetric flask, add an appropriate amount of white oil, and dilute with the blank solution to reach the concentrations given in Table 2. Table 2 concentrations: serial numbers 1~5, concentrations 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 mg/kg (the original unit source-text extraction writes "f[unreadable unit character].L", requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction)). Note: ① The standard working solutions must be prepared on the day of the test; ② An appropriate amount of white oil is added to the standard working solutions so that the viscosity of the standard working solutions and the sample solution are basically consistent. If the sample amount is 1.5 g, the amount of white oil added is 2.0 g.

5. Instruments and equipment

Part One Ashing Method (4.1)

Part Two Direct Method (15.1)

6. Recommended operating conditions

Part One Ashing Method Table 1 Instrument operating conditions

Element lamp Analytical line wavelength nm Lamp current mA Burner height mm Air flow L/min Acetylene flow L/min
Fe 248.3 7 0.2 4 10

Note: The conditions in Table 1 are for reference only; the conditions for different instrument models are not exactly the same. (The original table header part source-text extraction has much noise; the values are based on the original text, requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))

Part Two Direct Method Table 3 Instrument operating conditions

Element Analytical line wavelength nm Lamp current mA Burner height mm Air flow L/min Acetylene flow L/min Extraction amount mL/min Expansion factor
Fe 248.3 9 0.19 4 10.0 2.0 2.8

Note: The performance of different instrument models varies; the above conditions are for reference only. (The original table header part source-text extraction has much noise; the values are based on the original text, requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))

7. Sampling and sample preparation

Part One Ashing Method (Chapter 7 Sampling) After the sample is thoroughly stirred evenly (if necessary, heated to about 60℃), take a representative test sample for analysis and testing.

Preparation work (6.2, 6.3):

Part Two Direct Method (18.2 Preparation of sample solution)

8. Analysis procedure

Part One Ashing Method (Chapter 8 Test procedure)

Working curve plotting (6.4.2, 6.4.3):

Part Two Direct Method (18.3 Measure Absorbance)

9. Qualitative and Quantitative and Calculation Formulas

Part One Ashing Method (Chapter 9 Calculation)

9.1 The iron content in the test portion X (mg/kg) is calculated according to formula (1):

X = Cx · V / m

Where:

(The original formula (1)source-text extraction is displayed as “[unreadable formula symbol] Cx”, the formula form requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))

9.2 If the measured value is in the linear portion of the working curve (that is, when the absorbance of the test solution is less than the absorbance of the 10 μg/mL standard working solution), the iron content in the test portion X (mg/kg) is calculated according to formula (2):

X = (Ax / As) · Cs · V / m

Where:

(The original formula (2)source-text extraction is displayed as “[unreadable formula symbol], Ax AF·”, the formula form requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))

Part Two Direct Method (Chapter 19 Calculation)

The iron content in the test portion X (mg/kg) is calculated according to formula (3):

X = (Ax · C · f · 25) / (As · m)

Where:

(The original formula (3)source-text extraction is displayed as “X [unreadable formula symbol] Ax·C·f x 25 / A,·m”, the formula form requires confirmation against the source standard (source-text extraction))

10. Precision

Part One Ashing Method (Chapter 10) Judge the reliability of test results according to the following provisions (95% confidence level).

Part Two Direct Method (Chapter 20) Judge the reliability of test results according to the following provisions (95% confidence level).

11. Report

Part One Ashing Method (Chapter 11) Take the arithmetic mean of two results of repeated measurements as the measurement result, and round to an integer.

Part Two Direct Method (Chapter 21) Take the arithmetic mean of two results of repeated measurements as the measurement result, and round to an integer.

12. Reference Documents

Part One Ashing Method (Chapter 2 Reference Standards)

Part Two Direct Method (Chapter 13 Reference Standards)

Additional Notes:

13. Source and verification

This page is an AI translation of the available Chinese method card. Human verification is pending. It is not an official translation of the standard. Check the source standard and product certificate before use.

14. Quick Reference Q&A

Question Key Answer Points
How many methods does this standard contain? Two methods: Part One Ashing Method, Part Two Direct Method.
Applicable concentration range? Both parts are 10~200 mg/kg.
Analytical line wavelength for the ashing method? 248.3 nm.
Analytical line wavelength for the direct method? 248.3 nm.
Ashing temperature for the ashing method? 775℃±25℃, according to the method of GB/T 508.
Sample amount for the ashing method? 2~5 g (to the nearest 0.1 mg).
Sample amount for the direct method? 1~3 g (to the nearest 0.1 mg).
Standard solution concentration series for the ashing method? 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20 μg/mL, containing hydrochloric acid 10%(V/V).
Standard working solution concentration series for the direct method? 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 mg/kg (Table 2).
Iron standard stock solution concentration for the ashing method? 1 mg/mL, prepared from ferric oxide 1.4296 g.
Iron standard stock solution concentration for the direct method? 200 mg/kg, can be stored for three months.
Repeatability requirement? Both parts are: the difference between two results of repeated measurements by the same operator shall not exceed 10% of the arithmetic mean.
Reproducibility requirement? Both parts are: the difference between two results submitted by different laboratories shall not exceed 30% of the arithmetic mean.
Rounding of result report? Take the arithmetic mean of two results of repeated measurements, rounded to an integer.
Reference standard for the ashing method? GB/T 508 Determination of Ash in Petroleum Products.
Reference standards for the direct method? SH 0005 Solvent Naphtha for Paint Industry; SH 0007 White Oil for Cosmetics.
What is the blank solution for the direct method? Solvent Naphtha for Paint Industry.
Can the standard working solution for the direct method be prepared on the same day? Must be prepared on the day of the test.
Can the standard solution for the ashing method be prepared on the same day? It does not have to be prepared on the same day; it can be used for several weeks.
Which foreign standard is referenced for adoption? Federal Republic of Germany national standard DIN 51397 TIT2(80).

Related public products

Method references do not confirm that a product is suitable for this edition. Check its certificate and availability.

Search related products

Source and review status

This translation has not received a complete independent technical review. Missing sections and unclear source values remain identified above.